Providing feedback and correcting errors to learners on their performance is an important aspect of teaching. In the traditional educational environment the errors made by the students are frequently corrected and given feedback, because the focus of classroom instruction is on accuracy. Giving feedback and correcting errors may serve not only to let learners know how well they have performed, but also to increase motivation and build a supportive classroom environment.

In this context, this paper aims at highlighting the importance of feedback, some key areas including what is error and feedback, types and models of feedback, attitudes towards errors and some feedback strategies.



Oferirea feedback-ului și corectarea greșelilor studenților cu privire la performanța lor este un aspect important al procesului educațional. În mediul educațional tradițional greșelile făcute de studenți sunt adesea corectate și prin feedback-ul oferit, deoarece predarea în clasă se concentrează pe precizie. Oferirea feedback-ului și corectarea greșelilor pot servi nu doar pentru a permite studenților să știe cât de bine au îndeplinit ceea ce era necesar, ci și pentru a crește motivația și pentru a construi în clasă un mediu favorabil și motivant.

În articol se urmărește evidențierea importanței feedback-ului, fiind abordate câteva aspecte-cheie, cum ar fi definiția greșelii și a feedback-ului, tipurile și modelele de feedback, atitudinea față de greșeli și unele strategii de feedback.


feedback, errors, error correction, assessment, learning process

Full Text:



HATTIE, J., TIMPERLEY, H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 2007, no77, p.81-112.

MORY, E.H. Feedback research revisited. In: D.H. Jonassen (Ed.). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. New York: MacMillan Library Reference, 2003, p.745-783.

SHUTE, V. Focus on formative feedback. In: Review of Educational Research, 2008, no78(1), p.153-189.

LEWIS, M. Giving feedback in language classes. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre, 2002.

BAKER, W. A critical examination of ELT in Thailand: The role of cultural awareness. In: RELC, 2013, no39(1), p.131-146.

ELLIS, R. The Study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

LIGHTBOWN, P., SPADA, N. How Languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

O’DONOVAN, B., PRICE, M., RUST, C. Developing student understanding of assessment standards: A nested hierarchy of approaches. In: Teaching in Higher Education, 2008, vol.13, no.2, p.205-16.

HEITINK, M., VAN DER KLEIJ, F., VELDKAMP, B., SCHILDKAMP, K., KIPPERS, W. A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. In: Educational Research Review, 2016, vol.17, p.50-62.

ASKEW, S., LODGE, C. Gifts, ping-pong and loops: Linking feedback and learning. In: Feedback for learning / Ed. S.Askew, chap.1. London: Routledge, 2000, p.1-17.

VAN DEN BERGH, L, ROS, A., BEIJAARD, D. Improving Teacher Feedback During Active Learning: Effects of a Professional Development Program. In: American Educational Research Journal, 2014, vol.51, no 4, p.772-809.

HATTIE, J., TIMPERLEY, H. The power of feedback. In: Review of Educational Research, 2007, no77, p.81-112.

BLACK, P., WILIAM, D. Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. In: Phi Delta Kappan, 2010, no92(1), p.81-90.

BLACK, P., WILIAM, D. Assessment and Classroom Learning. In: Assessment in Education, 1998, vol.5, no1, p.7-74.

BLACK, P., WILIAM, D. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment. In: Evaluation and Accountability, 2009, vol.21, no1, p.5-31.

WILIAM, D. The role of formative assessment in effective learning environments. In: The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice, 2010, p.135-155.

CARLESS, D. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. In: Studies in Higher Education, 2006, no31(2), p.219-233.

ROLLINSON, P. Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. In: ELT Journal, 2005, no59(1), p.23-30.

SMITH, H. Correct me if I am wrong: Investigating the preferences in error correction among adult English language learners (MA thesis). Florida: University of Central Florida Orlando, 2010.

PAULUS, T.M. The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. In: Journal of Second Language Writing, 1999, no8(3), p.265-289.

CHANDLER, J. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. In: Journal of Second Language Writing, 2003, no12(3), p.267-296.

BROOKHART, S.M. How to give effective feedback to your students. Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 2008.

BUTLER, D.L., WINNE, P.H. Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. In: Review of Educational Research, 1995, no65, p.245-281.

MO, W. “Can you listen faster?” Assessment of students who are culturally and linguistically diverse learners. In: P.Jones, J.F. Carr, & R.L. Ataya (Eds.). A pig don’t get fatter the more you weigh it: Classroom assessments that work (p.39-50). New York: Teachers College Press, 2007.

TUNSTALL, P., GIPPS, C. Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. In: British Educational Research Journal, 1996, no22, p.389-404.


  • There are currently no refbacks.