THE ROLE OF COURT PRESIDENTS AND OF THE JUDICIAL INSPECTION BODY IN STRENGTHENING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE JUDICIARY. FUNCTIONAL INTERACTIONS FOR ACHIEVING A COMMON GOAL

Radu ȚURCANU, Natalia CRECIUN

Abstract


The present paper focuses on the argumentation of the indispensability to correlate, in a prudent manner, the efforts of Court Presidents and of the judicial inspection body in streamlining Justice. Such a form of professional collaboration aims to improve Justice as a public service, to continuously promote the reformation and consolidation of Justice in order to meet the reasonable expectations of court users and to protect and safeguard the Fundamental Human Rights.

 

ROLUL PREȘEDINȚILOR DE INSTANȚE ȘI AL ORGANULUI DE INSPECȚIE JUDICIARĂ
ÎN FORTIFICAREA PERFORMANȚEI JUSTIȚIEI. INTERACȚIUNI FUNCȚIONALE ÎNTRU
VALORIFICAREA SCOPULUI COMUN

Prezenta lucrare este axată pe argumentarea indispensabilității corelării, într-o manieră prudentă, a eforturilor preșe­dinților de instanțe și ale organului de inspecție judiciară în eficientizarea justiției. O asemenea formă de colaborare profesională are drept scop îmbunătățirea justiției ca serviciu public, promovarea continuă a reformării și consolidării justiției, pentru a răspunde așteptărilor rezonabile ale celor care apelează la instanțele de judecată, pentru a proteja și a garanta drepturile fundamentale ale omului.


Keywords


Court Presidents, judicial inspection, professional collaboration, quality of Justice, Justice as a public service, Human Rights.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Checklist for promoting the quality of justice and the courts. Adopted by the European Commission for Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) at its 11th plenary meeting (Strasbourg, 2-3 July 2008). 32 p. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/european-commission-for-efficiencyof-justice-cepej-checklist-for-promo/16807475cf

Measuring the Quality of Justice. European Commission for Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Strasbourg, 07.12.2016, [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/european-commission-for-the-efficiency-of-justice-cepej-measuring-the-/1680747548

European Judicial Systems – Efficiency and Quality of Justice. CEPEJ Studies No.26, 2018 Edition (2016 data), 338 p. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/rapport-avec-couv-18-09-2018-en/16808def9c

Current members. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://www.courtexcellence.com/members/current-members

Governance Policy of the International Consortium for Court Excellence. January 2020. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://www.courtexcellence.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/7324/icce-governance-policy-february-2020.pdf

International Framework for Court Excellence. International Consortium on Court Excellence. 2nd Edition, March 2013. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://www.courtexcellence.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/7312/the-international-framework-2e-2014-v3.pdf

BELEI, E. Exigențe față de hotărârea judecătorească (Exigencies to the judicial decision). In: Revista Institutului Național al Justiției, no.1-2, 2008, p.91-95. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://www.inj.md/sites/default/files/17/91-95_Exigente%20fata%20de%20hotarirea%20judecatoreasca.pdf

ALBERS, P. Quality of courts and judiciary: European experiences and global developments. 2008, 17 p. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://sites.estvideo.net/laurens1/web-content/pdf/quality.pdf

ALBERS, P. Towards excellent courts: an introduction of the international framework of court excellence. In: Contempo¬rary Court Administration: Key Element for Judicial Reform (Conference Book). 23-24 October 2014, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, p.12-14. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://crjm.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Cont-court-admin-2014.pdf

FRICERO, N. La qualité des décisions de justice au sens de l’article 6 § 1 de la Convention européenne des Droits de l’Homme (The quality of judicial decisions in the sense of the article 6 § 1 of the European Convention of Human Rights). In: La Qualité des décisions de la justice. Etudes réunies par Pascal Mbongo. 2007, p.49-59. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/la-qualite-des-decisions-de-justice-etudes-reunies-par-pascal-mbongo-p/16807882a6

FRYDMAN, B. L’évolution des critères et des modes de contrôle de la qualité des décisions de justice (The evolution of the criteria and of the ways of control of the quality of judicial decisions). In: La Qualité des décisions de la justice. Etudes réunies par Pascal Mbongo, 2007, p.18-29. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/la-qualite-des-decisions-de-justice-etudes-reunies-par-pascal-mbongo-p/16807882a6

JEAN, J.P. La qualité des décisions de justice au sens du Conseil de l’Europe (The quality of the judicial decisions in the sense of the Council of Europe). In: La Qualité des décisions de la justice. Etudes réunies par Pascal Mbongo. 2007, p.30-48. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/la-qualite-des-decisions-de-justice-etudes-reunies-par-pascal-mbongo-p/16807882a6

DEVLIN, R., DODEK, A. Regulating Judges. Beyond Independence and Accountability. Edward Elgar Publishing. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA, 2016. 419 p. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://books.google.md/books?hl=ro&lr=&id=LhelDQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=judicial+inspections,+judicial+councils&ots=SXPhUW9D7o&sig=BdAlbLPj8AeBO1dHHESWGQBYyoY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=judicial%20inspections%2C%20judicial%20councils&f=false

LANGBROEK, P., DIJKSTRA, R., BOZORG ZADEH, K., TURK, Z. Performance management of courts and judges: Organizational and professional learning versus political accountabilities. In: Handle with care: Deliverable 3.1: Report- Performance management of courts and judges: Organisational and professional learning vs political accountability (p.297-325), December 2017. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/ en/publications/performance-management-of-courts-and-judges-organizational-and-pr

Opinion 19 (2016) of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE). The role of court presidents. Strasbourg, 10.11.2016. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/1680748232

International Framework for Court Excellence. International Consortium on Court Excellence. 2nd Edition, March 2013. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://www.courtexcellence.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/7312/the-international-framework-2e-2014-v3.pdf

CEPEJ (2019)15/6 December 2019, Breaking up judges’ isolation - Guidelines to improve the judge's skills and competences, strengthen knowledge sharing and collaboration, and move beyond a culture of judicial isolation. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/cepej-2019-15-en-knowledge-sharing/16809939e4

BLISA, A., KOSAR, D. Court Presidents: The Missing Piece in the Puzzle of Judicial Governance. In: German Law Journal, 19(7), 2018, p.2031-2036, p.2045-2047. [cited 25 October 2020]. Doi:10.1017/S2071832200023324

LANGBROEK, P., DIJKSTRA, R., BOZORG ZADEH K., TURK, Z. Performance management of courts and judges: Organizational and professional learning versus political accountabilities. In: Handle with care: Deliverable 3.1: Report- Performance management of courts and judges: Organisational and professional learning vs political accountability (p.297-325), December 2017. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/ en/publications/performance-management-of-courts-and-judges-organizational-and-pr

Report on Judicial Independence and Impartiality in the Council of Europe Member States in 2017. Prepared by the Bureau of the CCJE following the proposal of the Secretary General of the Council of Europe. CCJE/BU(2017)11, Strasbourg, 7 February 2018. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/2017-report-situation-ofjudges-in-member-states/1680786ae1

International Framework for Court Excellence. International Consortium on Court Excellence. 2nd Edition, March 2013. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://www.courtexcellence.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/7312/the-international-framework-2e-2014-v3.pdf

International Framework for Court Excellence. International Consortium on Court Excellence. 2nd Edition, March 2013. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://www.courtexcellence.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/7312/the-international-framework-2e-2014-v3.pdf

MAAN, B. Past and Future for Management of Courts. In: International Journal for Court Administration, August 2009, 8 p. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ijca2&div=9&id=&page= (Google Scholar)

DUPONT, E., SCHOENAERS, F. Réformes de la justice belge: les transformations du rôle de chef de corps, la res-ponsabilisation des local managers (The reforms of Belgian justice: the transformations of the role of court presidents, the responsibility of local mangers). In: Pyramides. Revue du Centre d`Etudes et de Recherches en Administration publique, 2017, no.29, p.119-142. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://journals.openedition.org/pyramides/1278

ALT, E. Calitatea hotărârilor judecătorești (The quality of judicial decisions). În: Revista Forumul Judecătorilor, 2009, nr.2, p.52-56. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://www.forumuljudecatorilor.ro/wp-content/uploads/Art-7-Forumul-judecatorilor-nr-2-2009.pdf

CEPEJ(2019)15/6 December 2019, Breaking up judges’ isolation - Guidelines to improve the judge's skills and competences, strengthen knowledge sharing and collaboration, and move beyond a culture of judicial isolation. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/cepej-2019-15-en-knowledge-sharing/16809939e4

TAAL, S., VAN DER VELDE, M., LANGBROEK, P. Reducing Unwarranted Disparities: The Challenge of Managing Knowledge Sharing Between Judges. In: International Journal for Court Administration, 2014, vol.6, no.2, p.73-83. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ijca6&div=24&id=&page= (Google Scholar)

MAAN, B. Past and Future for Management of Courts. In: International Journal for Court Administration, August 2009. 8 p. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ijca2&div=9&id=&page= (Google Scholar)

International Framework for Court Excellence. International Consortium on Court Excellence. 2nd Edition, March 2013. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://www.courtexcellence.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/7312/the-international-framework-2e-2014-v3.pdf

Opinion no.19 (2016) of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) on The Role of Court Presidents, Strasbourg, 10 November 2016. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/1680748232

International Framework for Court Excellence. International Consortium on Court Excellence. 2nd Edition, March 2013. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://www.courtexcellence.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/7312/the-international-framework-2e-2014-v3.pdf

MAAN, B. Past and Future for Management of Courts. In: International Journal for Court Administration, August 2009. 8 p. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ijca2&div=9&id=&page= (Google Scholar)

Compilation of Venice Comission Opinions and Reports concerning Courts and Judges. Strasbourg, 5 Mars 2015. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-PI(2015)001-e

Opinion no.10(2007) of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) to the attention of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the Council for the Judiciary at the service of society. Strasbourg, 21-23 November 2007. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/168074779b

Measuring the Quality of Justice. European Commission for Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Strasbourg, 07.12.2016. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/european-commission-for-the-efficiency-of-justice-cepej-measuring-the-/1680747548

Regulation on the organization, the competence and the functioning of the Judicial Inspection. Aproved by the Decision of the Superior Council of Magistracy, no.506/24 of 13.11.2018. In: Official Gazette of the Republic of Moldova, 2019, no.13-21. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=112154〈=ro

Law on the status of judges and prosecutors, no.303 of 28.06.2004. In: Official Gazette of Romania, 13.09.2005, no.826. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/64928

Law on the Superior Council of Magistracy, no.317 of 01 July 2004. In: Official Gazette of Romania, 01.09.2012, no.628. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/64942

Regulations on Court of Honour. Approved by the Resolution of the Judicial Council of Lithuania, no. 13P-68-(7.1.2) of 30.05.2014, Vilnius. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://www.teismai.lt/en/self-governance-of-courts/judicial-court-of-honour/about-court/664

Regulations of the Judicial Ethics and Discipline Commission. Approved by the Resolution of the Judicial Council of Lithuania, no.13P-10-(7.1.2) of 25.01.2019, Vilnius. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://www.teismai.lt/ en/self-governance-of-courts/judicial-ethics-and-discipline-commission/about-commission/667

Regulation on work of the Judicial Council. Approved by the Resolution of the Judicial Council, no.13P-30-(7.1.2) of 24.02.2017. Vilnius. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://www.teismai.lt/en/self-governance-of-courts/judicial-council/about-council/660

Code Judiciaire (Judicial Code), 10 October 1967. In: Moniteur Belge, 31.10.1967, no.1967101053. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi_loi/change_lg.pl?language=fr&la=F&cn=1967101002&table_name=loi

Opinion CCJE 21(2018) Preventing corruption among judges, 09.11.2018, Zagreb. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://www.coe.int/en/web/ccje/ccje-opinions-and-magna-carta

Measuring the Quality of Justice. European Commission for Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Strasbourg, 07.12.2016. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/european-commission-for-the-efficiency-of-justice-cepej-measuring-the-/1680747548

Opinion CCJE no.6(2004) to the attention of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on fair trial within a reasonable time and judges’ role in trials taking into account alternative means of dispute settlement, as adopted by the CCJE at its 5th meeting. Strasbourg, 22-24 November 2004. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/168074752d

Opinion CCJE no.19(2016) The role of Court Presidents. Strasbourg, 10 November 2016. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/1680748232

Opinion CCJE no.1(2001) to the attention of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on standards concerning the independence of the Judiciary and the irremovability of judges. Strasbourg, 23 November 2001. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/1680747830

Measuring the Quality of Justice. European Commission for Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Strasbourg, 07.12.2016. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/european-commission-for-the-efficiency-of-justice-cepej-measuring-the-/1680747548

International Framework for Court Excellence. International Consortium on Court Excellence. 2nd Edition, March 2013. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://www.courtexcellence.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/7312/the-international-framework-2e-2014-v3.pdf

MAGALI, C. Les plaintes en cas de dysfonctionnement de la Justice: jusqu’où peut aller le Conseil supérieur de la justice? (The complaints in case of dysfunctionality of Justice: how far the Superior Council of Magistracy can go?), 10.04.2017. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://www.justice-en-ligne.be/Les-plaintes-en-cas-de

NEGRU, A., CHICU, O. Interacțiuni doctrinare dintre răspunderea juridică și responsabilitate juridică (Doctrinal interactions between legal accountability and legal responsibility). In: Studia Universitatis Moldaviae, 2018, no.8(118), p.35-44. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://studiamsu.eu/wp-content/uploads/05.p.35-44_118.pdf

International Framework for Court Excellence. International Consortium on Court Excellence. 2nd Edition, March 2013. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://www.courtexcellence.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/7312/the-international-framework-2e-2014-v3.pdf

NEGRU, A. Valorificări teoretice și perspective praxiologice ale fenomenului justiției consolidate (Theoretical ca¬pi-ta¬lizations and praxiological perspectives of the consolidated justice phenomenon). În: Legea și Viața, no.11, 2012, p.52-58. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://ibn.idsi.md/sites/default/files/imag_file/Valorificari%20teoretice%20si%20perspective%20praxiologice%20ale%20fenomenului%20justitiei%20consolidate.pdf

LIENHARD, A., KETTIGER, D. Between Management and the Rule of Law Results of the Research Project „Basic Research into Court Management in Switzerland”. In: International Journal for Court Administration, 2017, vol.8, no.2, 19 p. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://boris.unibe.ch/101256/1/Lienhard_Kettiger_BetweenManagementAndTheRuleOfLaw.pdf

European Judicial Systems – Efficiency and Quality of Justice. CEPEJ Studies No.26, 2018 Edition (2016 data), 338 p. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/rapport-avec-couv-18-09-2018-en/16808def9c

Measuring the Quality of Justice. European Commission for Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Strasbourg, 07.12.2016. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: https://rm.coe.int/european-commission-for-the-efficiency-of-justice-cepej-measuring-the-/1680747548

SIMONIS, M. Effective Court Administration and Professionalism of Judges as Necessary Factors Safeguarding the Mother of Justice – The Right to a Fair Trial. In: International Journal for Court Administration, 2020, 10(1), p.47–58. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.294

International Framework for Court Excellence. International Consortium on Court Excellence. 2nd Edition, March 2013. [cited 25 October 2020]. Available: http://www.courtexcellence.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/7312/the-international-framework-2e-2014-v3.pdf


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.