Jonas Christensen, Joachim THOENNESSEN, Janet WALKER


This article reflects on issues and lessons from an annual joint programme of learning for social work students from England, Germanyand Sweden. It contributes to the understanding and development of International Social Work Education. The initial focus is on introducing communities of practice (CoP´s) as a theoretical framework. We extend this idea to interlocking circles with students, educators and practitioners. Further on, the question of how learning in Social Work in an international context can be organized and pushed on is adressed. Through participant feedback we highlight views and experiences of students who have learned from the programme. We show that a continuous cross-border cooperation in Social work Education in which teacher´s work closely together within permanent meeting places provides a social context in itself for students and teachers. Our main conclusion is that out of different learning outcomes, the environmental one is our ´unique´ contribution to knowledge and learning. A continuous cross-border cooperation in Social Work Education in which educators, students and practitioners work closely together within permanent meeting places, creates a social context in itself for all involved actors. Learning through the stimulation of being in a new meeting place and culture may create a new framework for learning in the International Social Work discipline. Our cooperation encourages the student´s capacity for social construction.


social education, learning, community of practice (CoP), international social work, cross-border.

Full Text:



MERRIL, M.C., FROST, C.J. Internationalizing Social Work Education: Models, Methods and Meanings. Frontiers. In: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 2011, no21, p.189-210.

HEALY, L. International Social Work: Professional Action in an interdependent world. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2008, p.43-47.

NAGY, G., & FALK, D.S. Dilemmas in international and cross-cultural social work education. In: International Social Work, 2000, vol.43, no1, p.49-60.

HARRISON, G. & MELVILLE, R. Rethinking social work in a global world. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

COX, D., PAWAR, M. International Social Work: Issues, Strategies and Programs. Thousand Oak: Sage, 2006.

LAVE, J., WENGER, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-42374-0.; first published in 1990 as Institute for Research on Learning report 90-0013, 1991.

KIETZMANN, J., PLANGGER, K., EATON, B., HEILGENBERG, K., PITT, L., BERTHON, P. Mobility at work: A typology of mobile communities of practice and contextual ambidexterity. In: Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2013, no3(4).

SMITH, M.K. ‘Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger and communities of practice’, theencyclopedia of informal education, 2003, 2009. Retrieved Oct 9th, 2016.

BARNETT, R. University knowledge in an age of super complexity. Higher Education, 2000, p.409-422.

WENGER, E., MCDERMOTT, R., SNYDER, W.M. Cultivating Communities of Practice. Harvard Business Press, 2002., Retrieved Nov 20th, 2016.

JULIUSDOTTIR, S., PETRSSON, J. Common Social Work Education Standards in the Nordic Countries – opening an issue. In: Social Work and Society, 2003, vol.1, no.1, p.6-10.

HUGMAN, R. Understanding international social work: A critical analysis. Palgrave/Macmillan, 2010.

GRAY, M., FOOK, J. The Quest for a Universal Social Work: Some Issues and Implications. In: Social Work Education, 2004, vol.23, no.5, p.625-644.


  • There are currently no refbacks.